Skip to content
Pascal Institute
Mobile navigation

Public model evidence

Model Leaderboard

Compare verified public model versions. Choose a market and the evidence that should determine rank.

What do you want to compare?

Accuracy

Which model has shown the best probability accuracy?

Betting results

Which model has shown the strongest betting results?

Market validation

Which model has shown favorable market validation?

MLBTotal0 rankedPolicy mlb-public-v130 graded / 30 metric minimum

Log loss leaderboard

Probability accuracy with a larger penalty for confident forecasts that are wrong. Lower is better; 0 is perfect.

Quick read: No model version currently has a ranked Log loss result.

empty

No Total public evidence yet

No public model version currently has recorded total evidence available for this leaderboard. Choose another market or browse the public models. No rankings are being withheld.

Method, sample rules, and exclusions
Policy mlb-public-v1. A version needs at least 30 graded forecasts and 30 observations eligible for Log loss. Lower is better. Each market and immutable version is evaluated separately. Rankings never include backtests, private-era forecasts, research results, or user decisions. Voids and invalidations remain visible in each version’s record but are excluded from metric calculations under the shared public-performance contract. Pausing or ending tracking stops future collection; it does not remove or rerank evidence already accumulated.

Rank is the beginning of the question

Compare sample, period, uncertainty, and evidence—not only position. Then test a model whose assumptions you can inspect.