Public model evidence
Model Leaderboard
Compare verified public model versions. Choose a market and the evidence that should determine rank.
Market
What do you want to compare?
Win rate leaderboard
The share of eligible settled selections that won. It does not account for the price paid. Higher is better.
Best displayed result
2 models tied at displayed precision
Public tracking active
50.00%
Quick read: The leader has the highest observed win rate. Win rate ignores the price paid and should not be read as profitability. Ranks 1 and 2 have overlapping 95% intervals; their order is not clearly separated.
- 50.00%
Win rate
Best observed
- Metric sample
- 320 eligible · 30 required
- Graded sample
- 320 graded · 30 required
- Period
- Oct 2, 2026 – Sep 30, 2026
- Uncertainty
- 95% CI 44.55% to 55.45%
Open permanent version evidence →Latest eligible public forecast Sep 30, 2026
2 pending · 0 excluded total · 0 voided · 0 invalidated · 0 corrected
- 50.00%
Win rate
Best observed
- Metric sample
- 292 eligible · 30 required
- Graded sample
- 292 graded · 30 required
- Period
- Oct 9, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026
- Uncertainty
- 95% CI 44.30% to 55.70%
Open permanent version evidence →Latest eligible public forecast Sep 23, 2026
2 pending · 0 excluded total · 0 voided · 0 invalidated · 0 corrected
- 50.00%
Win rate
Not ranked
- Metric sample
- 24 eligible · 6 short of 30
- Graded sample
- 24 graded · 6 short of 30
- Period
- Sep 18, 2026 – Sep 18, 2026
- Uncertainty
- 95% CI 31.43% to 68.57%
Open permanent version evidence →Latest eligible public forecast Sep 18, 2026
0 pending · 0 excluded total · 0 voided · 0 invalidated · 0 corrected
Sorted by Win rate (higher is better). Gaps are differences between observed point estimates, not proof that models are meaningfully separated. Equal displayed values share a visible rank; canonical ordering still uses full precision, then eligible sample size, then stable identity. “Establishing” versions remain visible but are not ranked.
Method, sample rules, and exclusions
Rank is the beginning of the question
Compare sample, period, uncertainty, and evidence—not only position. Then test a model whose assumptions you can inspect.